Navigation

    Citadel.one forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Citadel.one considerations behind proposal #56 NO vote

    Network Proposals
    1
    1
    1300
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • I
      Ilia Citadel.one last edited by Ilia Citadel.one

      Dear Secret community!

      We decided to vote NO on proposal #56 due to the number of concerns as we believe this proposal is unreasonable in multiple ways.

      We doubt there is a need for such a large hardware investment considering all the cons it brings compared to outsourcing (rent):

      1. There are multiple scenarios when renting is a much better option. Currently there is simply not enough demand for such a number of nodes. Eventually it will come in the future, however hardware requirements may be different in due time (like new generation of processors).
      2. Rent is a more agile option allowing to reflect real demand dynamically.
      3. Besides, it removes the need for hosting support expenses which we can easily see as the next proposal.
      4. Assuming SCRT price will increase, paying renting fees on quartelly (or any other time adjusted basis) is a more capital efficient option.

      Finally, we believe this proposal will lead to the unnecessary centralisation of hosting power in the hands of one entity.

      Sincerely yours

      Citadel.one team

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • First post
        Last post
      Powered by NodeBB | Contributors