Navigation

    Citadel.one forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • I

      $OSMO Staking XCT Incentive off-chain proposal #2
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • iamvlad

      54
      12
      Votes
      54
      Posts
      3414
      Views

      A

      I am agree

    • I

      XCT Buyback and Burn Off-chain Proposal #1
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • iamvlad

      47
      12
      Votes
      47
      Posts
      5739
      Views

      Y

      good idea !
      thx

    • I

      Citadel.one DAO off-chain proposal #3. Expand the XCT reward program on all newly integrated networks
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • iamvlad

      37
      6
      Votes
      37
      Posts
      2672
      Views

      A

      yes yes yes too

    • A

      Spanish Content Translation - Community Proposal
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • Agustin12

      12
      4
      Votes
      12
      Posts
      262
      Views

      T

      @agustin12 Excelente iniciativa..!

    • S

      CSV export
      FAQ & Feedback • • SayHey

      10
      1
      Votes
      10
      Posts
      1488
      Views

      I

      @sayhey
      We have made the designs for the future Tax Report Extension already, but the actual development might take a significant amount of time because Citadel.one supports many kinds of transactions, including bridges, LP, swaps and so on.

    • I

      ATOM/USDT Pair on Injective DEX
      Network Proposals • • iamvlad

      7
      0
      Votes
      7
      Posts
      2146
      Views

      I

      @achilleaskal Thanks for the heads up!

    • P

      Cosmos ecosys. Validator suggestions
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • patchy420

      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      531
      Views

      A

      @hysticali yes, we have plans to integrate all (Citadel.one validated) cosmos based networks till the end of the year. OSMO, JUNO XRPT, IRIS, DVPN, INJ and KI are in the list

    • Dupre

      Password, 2FA
      FAQ & Feedback • • Dupre

      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      573
      Views

      I

      @dupre will add customable fees in the future

    • I

      What would you like to see in our Roadmap?
      FAQ & Feedback • • Ilia Citadel.one

      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      999
      Views

      Dupre

      @ilia-citadel-one

      Optional enabling of 2FA (e.g. Google Authenticator). browsers often remember the password, & a Citadel should be a strong place. Opening the DAO place on the App
    • S

      Server error when staking xct - Error ServerError: Returned error: operation is not available
      FAQ & Feedback • • similiken

      5
      0
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      760
      Views

      I

      Hey @similiken, that's right the issue was fixed. The staking problem appeared for those accounts that voted on the first governance proposal.
      Yesterday we relaunched it and the issue was automatically resolved.
      Sorry for the inconvenience!

    • J

      A Proposal For A Dark Mode Interface on Citadelone Web and Mobile App.
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • Joshua

      5
      7
      Votes
      5
      Posts
      608
      Views

      Lain

      this has been a need since day one lol. C1 team we are waiting ;]

    • Dupre

      What is the public sale? Are XCT stakable?
      FAQ & Feedback • • Dupre

      4
      0
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      475
      Views

      Dupre

      Guide on medium is released.
      I finally stacked my XCT, thanks 🙂

    • S

      For-HIRE Applicants
      Jobs • • Shariful1000

      4
      1
      Votes
      4
      Posts
      770
      Views

      R

      My name is Claudio, and I'm interested in being your Italian translator (both for the website, mobile app, or anything really).

      I've been personally involved in crypto for a little more than 3 years and I've applied for a variety of jobs in the web3 space from translating to writing articles/threads, making guides and quizzes.
      I'm currently the official Italian translator for Cwallet.com (Crypto wallet similar to Citadel.one) & Giveaway.com and most of my past work was for Secret Network as well as some other small projects: Stakewolle, StacksNFT.

      I've been personally using Citadel.one for at least 2 years, I'm familiar with all the crypto terminology/slang and I have a C1 Cambridge certificate (not attached here as it contains private information, I can send it via email). For these reasons I think I fit this position perfectly.

      All of my past online jobs required collaboration via google docs, drive, excel etc. so I'm very familiar with the google and Microsoft work stack and Crowdin.com for translations specifically.

      Here's some of my past work

      Translations:

      Cwallet website & app (~30k words)

      Giveaway.com website (~23k words)

      https://medium.com/@Raimo_0/staking-di-secret-una-guida-concreta-per-mettere-in-staking-e-delegare-scrt-d0892c57b5e3

      https://medium.com/@Raimo_0/secret-network-controllo-degli-accessi-chiavi-di-visualizzazione-e-permessi-ce1960435c46

      https://medium.com/p/381c8653b511

      https://medium.com/stakewolle/panoramica-di-kava-d52875ded8a1

      https://medium.com/stakewolle/stakewolle-panoramica-di-osmosis-336893b1b312

      https://medium.com/stakewolle/recensione-di-umee-70ad35872eea

      https://medium.com/stakewolle/il-validatore-stakewolle-f54c26dad2ec

      articles / guides / threads:

      https://medium.com/@secretnetwork/button-swap-yield-optimizer-guide-bacef0ad6adb

      https://typefully.com/Raimo_0/kYFicVj

      https://docs.scrt.network/docs/ecosystem-overview/secret-network-dictionary

      https://medium.com/@secretnetwork/this-guide-walks-through-everything-you-need-to-know-to-successfully-use-secretswap-c02f69125271

      https://docs.scrt.network/docs/development/testnet
      https://typefully.com/Raimo_0/stacks-revenue-sharing-nfts-joWGGgL

      https://www.reddit.com/r/Crypto_General/comments/zbg4hf/stacks_revenue_sharing_treasury_no_degen/

      https://medium.com/stakewolle/how-to-create-your-token-on-tgrade-66fcb0936ac6

      https://typefully.com/Raimo_0/rGcPVsl

      some of the best work I've done can't be shared publicly as it is still being integrated into websites or official pages.

      email: [email protected]

      hope to hear from you soon

    • I

      Injective Trading Reward Campaign Boost Update Proposal by Citadel.one
      Network Proposals • • Ilia Citadel.one

      3
      1
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      660
      Views

      A

      @kayo Thank you! As Validator,
      we're happy to contribute to the Injective ecosystem 😊

    • H

      Crypto fundamentals
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • hugoart

      3
      0
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      390
      Views

      A

      @hugoart, thank you for your time and attention.
      Here are some of our thoughts.

      as you said, we believe email log-in is a killer feature for multiple reasons. As Citadel.one is intended to be not just a mere service but a whole ecosystem, we envision our users switching web/mobile and Citade.one chrome extension (Metamask/Keplr like but cross-chain) seamlessly without losing any personalized UX. This means that users will have access to the very same addresses, transactions history, contacts book, DeFi Dapps, etc. no matter what platform he or she is using. To achieve this goal and provide this kind of service we need an account-based system. Another point behind email is that Citadel.one intends to become a marketplace for Dapps, and in this case, some kind of feedback/communication channel between users and Dapps developers is required by default.
      Considering your privacy concerns, which we fully respect as one of the core ideas behind crypto, you have several ways to bypass this. The easiest one - is just to use ad-hoc email (private, secure, spam even). We recommend using Proton, but other options are viable as well. Again, Citadel.one is not collecting any sensitive data and uses this feature to provide top-notch service for its users only.
      Regarding worries that your access to your funds depends on third-party services (like email) - Citadel.one is a non-custodial solution, your funds stay yours as long as you and only you have access to seed phrase (or private keys) associated with those funds. Losing access to your email will not affect funds in any way, as they are stored on a blockchain. To get access to them with Citadel.one you can simply register a new account with another email and restore access by importing your seed phrase / private key. Easy! You can have multiple Citadel.one accounts under different emails and the very same seed.
      Summarizing it all we believe convenience benefits overweight privacy concerns, which can be quite easily bypassed by using ad-hoc email. In the future, we have thoughts of introducing an ad-hoc intermediary email. Unfortunately, we can't integrate Metamask and Keplr earlier as we can not move our schedule, which is very tight.
      On the bright side, your point is "Keep your seed safe in one place.". But with Keplr and MM, you have at least 2 seeds (in our experience most people create different seeds for different wallets). Add Phantom for Solana, Polkadot.js for DOT, and others, and all of a sudden you have multiple seeds needed to be stored securely (in one place, still fragmented).
      Our approach is different. With Citadel.one one-seed you need only seed phrases for all networks, as it is a cross-chain solution. The real value of this approach will be realized at a later stage when cross-chain applications will start dominating the market. Imagine a Zapper-like app generating a complex cross-chain transaction from ETH Uniswap ETH/USDT pool and right into SeFi sETH/sUSDT, as an example. To make this a one-click service (which will require signing multiple transactions on several networks under the hood) cross-chain one seed is the only possible solution.
      It always takes time to build trust, but once it's done, perhaps someday convenience advantages will overweight fear, moving costs (perhaps laziness xD), and create a strong incentive to switch from MM and Keplr to Citadel.one.
      That's the future we are working forward.
      Best
      C1 Team
      PS We will become open source some time next year. For now we need it as it is not to loose our advantage.
    • F

      LikeCoin Validator for Citadel.One
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • flarnrules

      3
      3
      Votes
      3
      Posts
      361
      Views

      I

      Hi flarnrules.
      Thanks for your suggestion. We will research LikeCoin network and will consider setting up a node there.

    • I

      Citadel.one 2.0 is Live!
      Announcements • • Ilia Citadel.one

      2
      2
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      415
      Views

      A

      @ilia-citadel-one Loving the new app. Awesome job!

    • F

      Chihuahua Validator for Citadel.One
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • flarnrules

      2
      1
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      390
      Views

      F

      For anyone reading this topic, during my daily staking rewards claim today, I just saw that Citadel.One started validating on the Chihuahua chain. Nice job team!

    • D

      XCT rewards for superfluid staking
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • Danton

      2
      1
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      399
      Views

      I

      Hello, Danton!
      Thanks for your proposal. For now we don't have plans to add XCT incentive for superfluid staked OSMO with our Validator. We might consider this option in the future.

    • A

      Minimum amount for autorestake app
      Citadel.one DAO Proposals • • Atreyuu

      2
      1
      Votes
      2
      Posts
      156
      Views

      I

      Hello @atreyuu! Thanks for submitting a proposal on the forum.
      While I think we can consider changing the restake amount for some networks, we believe that 0.01 is a bit too low. Here are the reasons:

      First of all we will spam the network with numerous and numerous transactions that will be happening every block.

      Imagine users with big stakes, that accrue 0.01 each block, so the platform will be initiating transactions for one user every 7-12 seconds. Imagine same for hundreds or thousands of users.

      Another reason is that no matter the restake amount, the transaction fee is always +- the same. With such an amount of restake transactions we will be paying a lot of commissions (Citadel.one is paying all transactions on behalf of users no matter what validator they are staking with).

      We would suggest waiting a month or so, collect data on the restake app usage and then decide on each network specifically. Also, let's see the feedback and thoughts of other members and continue the discussion then.