My name is Claudio, and I'm interested in being your Italian translator (both for the website, mobile app, or anything really).

I've been personally involved in crypto for a little more than 3 years and I've applied for a variety of jobs in the web3 space from translating to writing articles/threads, making guides and quizzes.
I'm currently the official Italian translator for Cwallet.com (Crypto wallet similar to Citadel.one) & Giveaway.com and most of my past work was for Secret Network as well as some other small projects: Stakewolle, StacksNFT.

I've been personally using Citadel.one for at least 2 years, I'm familiar with all the crypto terminology/slang and I have a C1 Cambridge certificate (not attached here as it contains private information, I can send it via email). For these reasons I think I fit this position perfectly.

All of my past online jobs required collaboration via google docs, drive, excel etc. so I'm very familiar with the google and Microsoft work stack and Crowdin.com for translations specifically.

Here's some of my past work

Translations:

Cwallet website & app (~30k words)

Giveaway.com website (~23k words)

https://medium.com/@Raimo_0/staking-di-secret-una-guida-concreta-per-mettere-in-staking-e-delegare-scrt-d0892c57b5e3

https://medium.com/@Raimo_0/secret-network-controllo-degli-accessi-chiavi-di-visualizzazione-e-permessi-ce1960435c46

https://medium.com/p/381c8653b511

https://medium.com/stakewolle/panoramica-di-kava-d52875ded8a1

https://medium.com/stakewolle/stakewolle-panoramica-di-osmosis-336893b1b312

https://medium.com/stakewolle/recensione-di-umee-70ad35872eea

https://medium.com/stakewolle/il-validatore-stakewolle-f54c26dad2ec

articles / guides / threads:

https://medium.com/@secretnetwork/button-swap-yield-optimizer-guide-bacef0ad6adb

https://typefully.com/Raimo_0/kYFicVj

https://docs.scrt.network/docs/ecosystem-overview/secret-network-dictionary

https://medium.com/@secretnetwork/this-guide-walks-through-everything-you-need-to-know-to-successfully-use-secretswap-c02f69125271

https://docs.scrt.network/docs/development/testnet
https://typefully.com/Raimo_0/stacks-revenue-sharing-nfts-joWGGgL

https://www.reddit.com/r/Crypto_General/comments/zbg4hf/stacks_revenue_sharing_treasury_no_degen/

https://medium.com/stakewolle/how-to-create-your-token-on-tgrade-66fcb0936ac6

https://typefully.com/Raimo_0/rGcPVsl

some of the best work I've done can't be shared publicly as it is still being integrated into websites or official pages.

email: [email protected]

hope to hear from you soon

I see that C1 has voted against this prop.
I've been with C1 for a long time now with many chains, around 10,000 Atom, Juno, Osmo (largest is Atom) so not insignificant bags - but I will have to find a new validator as I don't think this decision adheres to C1's own guidelines.
It's been fun, see you around 🙂

Hi Lain,
Thanks for sharing the proposal. Let's see what community thinks about it.

Interesting requests.

Keplr.Metamask only sign up (without email) is coming pretty soon, may be early September As for setting a custom node, tbh we were considering cloud nodes and such but decided to move in a slightly different direction. Citadel.one is more general-user-centric now, meaning that such functionality wouldn't be in a great demand. However, once our SDK is ready and Dev Center is up and running, this option can be considered, especially if there's a demand from advanced C1 users.
Would love to hear from others too!

2FA with mobile phone is technically possible and this has been already discussed once somewhere in the chat. However, such functionality will require a lot of time and work, and is not currently in our priority, so we will keep it in mind, but without strong user demand I would't expect it any time soon.

Hi Felix. Thanks for your proposals. We discussed them with the team. The idea to create all addresses and then hide/show them on the frontend (sidebar) is an interesting idea. Added it to our waitlist.

Hello @atreyuu! Thanks for submitting a proposal on the forum.
While I think we can consider changing the restake amount for some networks, we believe that 0.01 is a bit too low. Here are the reasons:

First of all we will spam the network with numerous and numerous transactions that will be happening every block.

Imagine users with big stakes, that accrue 0.01 each block, so the platform will be initiating transactions for one user every 7-12 seconds. Imagine same for hundreds or thousands of users.

Another reason is that no matter the restake amount, the transaction fee is always +- the same. With such an amount of restake transactions we will be paying a lot of commissions (Citadel.one is paying all transactions on behalf of users no matter what validator they are staking with).

We would suggest waiting a month or so, collect data on the restake app usage and then decide on each network specifically. Also, let's see the feedback and thoughts of other members and continue the discussion then.

Hey @similiken, that's right the issue was fixed. The staking problem appeared for those accounts that voted on the first governance proposal.
Yesterday we relaunched it and the issue was automatically resolved.
Sorry for the inconvenience!

@agustin12 Excelente iniciativa..!

@sayhey
We have made the designs for the future Tax Report Extension already, but the actual development might take a significant amount of time because Citadel.one supports many kinds of transactions, including bridges, LP, swaps and so on.